Overdraft claims model

Priced on London Bridge's proposed terms: four quantum tiers, lender-specific pricing and two non-overdraft streams.

Clear Law · v3

Terms

Load a price structure, then adjust anything below. London Bridge terms are loaded by default.

£
%

Quantum tiers

TierShare of volumeEffectivePrice per opportunityAvg redress
Above £500 % — £ £
Above £1,000 % — £ £
Above £2,000 % — £ £
Above £3,000 % — £ £

—

Fee income is the fee rate applied to each tier's average redress, restricted by the SRA band caps, then weighted by volume share. Shifting volume into higher tiers raises the blended redress and the fee per win with it.

Blended tier price—
Blended price paid—
Overdraft spend—
Above £1,000—
Blended redress—
Fee per win—

Non-overdraft opportunities

Two streams on London Bridge's terms: opportunities on clients whose overdraft we buy, and opportunities on clients banking outside the acceptable list.

%

London Bridge have said the uplift reduces once gateway criteria apply, and that stricter criteria narrow it further. This is the control for that.

Stream A — billable overdraft clients

£
%

Stream B — clients banking outside the list

%
£
%
Stream A claims—
Stream B claims—
Non-OD spend—
Back end payable—

Overdraft lenders

Weighting and direct win rates from our settled outcomes. Fee per win is set by the quantum tiers above, not by lender. A price override applies where London Bridge prices that lender separately.

BankShareDirect winPrice override

—

%
%
Blended win rate—
Overdraft wins—
Effective fee rate—
Overdraft income—

Non-overdraft lenders

Weighting and outcomes across the thirteen lenders with settled data. The four lenders London Bridge require us to add carry no assumed income.

LenderShareDirect winFee per win

—

Blended win rate—
Non-OD wins—
Non-OD income—

Conversion and cost

100% — fixed, CFA and LOA signed at source
%
%
£
Live clients—
Total claims—
Cost per claim acquired—
Working capital—